[Bug 648549] Review Request: spice-vdagent - Agent for Spice guests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648549

--- Comment #6 from GermÃn Racca <gracca@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-11-09 10:58:35 EST ---
Hi Hans!

Thanks very much for your explanations about rpmlint output. As I said above,
there were some warnings/errors I didn't see before so I needed to see your
comments about them. Now it is all clear for me...and you didn't sound grumpy,
so don't worry about that :)

Some items that remains to check now that you, as upstream, released a modified
version. Some things like checksums didn't change because you only patched the
original code.

=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x]  Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architec ture.
     Tested on: x86_64
[x]  Rpmlint output:
     spice-vdagent.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US uinput ->
input, u input, sinciput
     spice-vdagent.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US uinput ->
input, u input, sinciput
     spice-vdagent.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc
/etc/xdg/autostart/spice-vdagent.desktop
     spice-vdagent.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary spice-vdagentd
     spice-vdagent.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary spice-vdagent
     spice-vdagent.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled
/etc/rc.d/init.d/spice-vdagentd
     spice-vdagent.x86_64: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/spice-vdagentd
$prog
     spice-vdagent.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled
/etc/rc.d/init.d/spice-vdagentd

=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
[x]  Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
     Tested on: x86_64

=== Final Notes ===
1. Now the real problem rpmlint detected is fixed and all those warnings were
explained by you in a previous comment.
2. Now I was able to successfully build the package in mock.

Therefore, your package is...

     ================
     *** APPROVED ***
     ================

I have tried to be as much clear as I could, but my English is poor, so if
something remained obscure please let me know. Also, I would like to hear from
you how I have been doing in my first review, so I can continue reviewing other
packages also.

All the best,
GermÃn.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]