Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-gpod - A python module to access iPod content Alias: python-gpod-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217066 ------- Additional Comments From tmz@xxxxxxxxx 2006-11-28 15:25 EST ------- I don't know what the timeframe is for that merging. It would mean that there are no python bindings for libgpod in FC5 and FC6, wouldn't it? I got the impression from from of the other bugs and threads referenced in those bugs on f-maintainers and f-e-l that there were folks who wanted to make use of these bindings now. Even after the merger, might it not be a good thing to have the python bindings packaged separately? If so, then when things get merged the specfile for libgpod can just add the BRs for the python bindings and add it as a subpackage. I'd already planned to keep close watch on libgpod in core and work with AlexL on any issues that might come up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review