Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freepops - a tool to get html mail through a pop daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208113 ------- Additional Comments From paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-11-28 06:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Spec URL: http://perso.orange.fr/gollum-on-the-web/freepops.spec > SRPM URL: http://perso.orange.fr/gollum-on-the-web/freepops-0.0.99-3.src.rpm > > Sorry for being so long but I didn't have internet access. > > So, I take care about your comments and tried to fix them. > But: > - I dismiss debuginfo package because it is not really necessary Why do you say that? Is this software completely bug-free, has it always been so, and will it always be so in the future? > - I still have problems with update, a personnal script which allow to update > plugins conveniently from an archive that I provide in the source package. > Rpmlint considers it as a simple file so it warns about strange permissions. > How could I do if I cannot use this kind of process? It would be better just to dispense with the script and reproduce its contents directly into the spot in %prep where you are calling it, since all it is doing is unpacking and placing updates into position. However, as noted in Comment #4, the unpacking should not happen in the SOURCES directory (it may clobber some other files there); you should use a temporary directory within the unpacked source area (i.e. in the build directory) for this purpose. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review