[Bug 529485] Review Request: qjoypad - Gamepad translator software

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529485

Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
             Blocks|                            |182235(FE-Legal)
         AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?

--- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-11-04 19:45:55 EDT ---
Looks good, thanks.  However, the licensing issue looks a bit bizarre and that
may require 

I note that the source code doesn't include any sort of GPL header.  That plus
the presense of the generic GPL text implies that any version of the GPL
applies, so GPL+ would be the correct license tag.  However, README.txt says:

   Check  out  LICENSE.txt or http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.txt
   for  details!  The  bare  bones  of  it  is,  this  program is
   distributed  in  open-source  form so that others may share it
   freely,  learn from it, or modify it as they see fit. However,
   under no circumstances can it be sold!

which demonstrates some pretty weak understanding of the GPL; whoever wrote it
didn't even read the second paragraph of the preamble.  I would assume that
this is merely (rather poor) explanatory text and that it's not attempting to
add an additional restriction to the GPL, because that would render the whole
undistributable.  However, I'm not a lawyer, so perhaps the legal folks should
take a look.

And, finally, there's this:

   This  code  was  written entirely by Nathan Gaylinn (excepting
   the  code used for displaying a tray icon that is adapted from
   the  Psi source [http://psi.affinix.com/]) but is based on the
   idea of xjoypad by Erich Kitzm<FC>ller.

My understanding is that Psi is GPLv2+.  However, I don't know exactly which
code came from Psi, or if it's sufficient force GPLv2+ on the whole work.

So, at this point I'd approve this, but we should see what the legal folks have
to say.  Or you could perhaps try to obtain clarification from upstream.

* source files match upstream.  sha256sum:
  b5aa088827a6f7231e43e45fb942917e3f677ef933109a7b41e13a6b443c95ca
   qjoypad-4.1.0.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
X license situation is confusing.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* compiler flags are appropriate.
* package builds in mock (f14, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
* debuginfo package looks complete.
* rpmlint has acceptable complaints.
* final provides and requires are sane:
  qjoypad-4.1.0-2.fc14.x86_64.rpm
   qjoypad = 4.1.0-2.fc14
   qjoypad(x86-64) = 4.1.0-2.fc14
  =
   libQtCore.so.4()(64bit)  
   libQtGui.so.4()(64bit)  
   libX11.so.6()(64bit)  
   libXtst.so.6()(64bit)  
   libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)  
   libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)  
   libstdc++.so.6()(64bit)  
   libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit)  
   libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit)  

  qjoypad-debuginfo-4.1.0-2.fc14.x86_64.rpm
   qjoypad-debuginfo = 4.1.0-2.fc14
   qjoypad-debuginfo(x86-64) = 4.1.0-2.fc14
  =
   (none)

* no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no generically named files
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no static libraries.
* no libtool .la files.
* desktop files valid and installed properly.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]