Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634911 --- Comment #6 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@xxxxx> 2010-11-04 10:58:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > > - The provided /usr/bin/node will generate a clash with the /usr/sbin/node[4] > > especially when the user will have in the PATH both /usr/bin/ and /usr/sbin/ > > and node[4] package installed. > > Upstream probably could not have chosen a more generic name. I'll leave it as > it is now and will attempt to settle this with upstream cooperation. So, upstream is not being very helpful here: http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs/browse_thread/thread/12a673a14838aa9a# Is this a blocker? Would it make sense to persuade the other package's upstream to change their executable name? That could be easier, since that's not an interpreter so is likely to be embedded in smaller number of scripts. Also it probably did not gain very wide adoption due state of their development, here's an excerpt from their README: This is a simple node frontend for Linux kernel AX.25, NETROM, ROSE and TCP. It's based on pms.c by Alan Cox (GW4PTS) but has been heavily modified since. It's probably not very well tested, not pretty, not very flexible and it is certainly not ready! However I think it's already somewhat usable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review