Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532169 Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-11-03 13:57:50 EDT --- For legal questions, it's best to block FE-Legal as I've done. I recall there are some specific issues surrounding that Unicode data. I agree that the dangling-relative-symlink complaints are not problematic. rpmlint isn't wrong here; it just doesn't check outside the package. I wouldn't split the package because one script has a different license; just list all of the licenses and indicate what is under which license. Although I don't see your script in the final package so I'm not sure why it would make any difference to the licensing. (Remember that the License: tag covers what's in the final, built RPM, not the source RPM.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review