Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630681 --- Comment #7 from Owen Taylor <otaylor@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-11-03 13:26:05 EDT --- Just to say that if someone else is interested in this package and wants to take it over, that would be fine with me. Dealing with this isn't very high on my radar at the moment and it could easily be 6 months until I get back to this. In terms of the notes above: * Fixing the rpath would be good. Weird that it ended up with one.... thought the build setup was pretty standard. * The 'library calls exit' stuff is just a pet-peeve of the rpmlint maintainer or something. I don't consider it to have any relevance to Fedora packaging. Haven't particularly evaluated the details for this package, but in every previous places I've encountered it, patching out the call would be a very odd thing to do in a Fedora package, and would often make the Fedora library incompatible with the upstream library. * I think man pages are only interesting if you write a real useful one and send it upstream. While that is never a bad thing to do, I consider it pretty much independent from the packaging process. * Haven't looked into itex2mml ... if it's something that can be packaged separately, sounds reasonable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review