Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ipw2100-firmware - Firmware for Intel® PRO/Wireless 2100 network adaptors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217350 ------- Additional Comments From matthias@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-11-27 13:07 EST ------- Bill, would you be so kind as to explain why? I've read all of the LICENSE file again and again, and don't see anything incompatible with the current "binary firmware" exception, so I must be missing something. Some of the relevant parts : "For OEMs, IHVs, and ISVs: [...] (ii) copy and distribute the Software to your end-users, but only under a license agreement with terms at least as restrictive as those contained in Intel's Final, Single User License Agreement, attached as Exhibit A" "Your rights to redistribute the Software shall be contingent upon your installation of this Agreement in its entirety in the same directory as the Software." (which is why the package puts the LICENSE in the same directory as the firmware itself) I see that sub-licensing is clearly forbidden, is this the problem? I don't think we sub-license, but rather redistribute with the same license, which shouldn't be a problem. But of course, IANAL and probably don't understand all these legal terms properly... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review