Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glest - 3D real time strategy game Alias: glest https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216130 chris.stone@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone@xxxxxxxxx 2006-11-26 19:42 EST ------- ==== REVIEW CHECKLIST ==== - rpmlint output clean - package named according to package naming guidelines - spec file name matches %{name} - package meets packaging guidelines - licensed with open source compatible license - license matches actual license - license file included in %doc - spec written in American english - spec legible - sources match upstream f7716da7a044dbe108c619b0f52621bb glest_source_2.0.0.zip - successfully compiles and builds on FC6 x86_64 - all build dependencies listed in BR - no locales - no shared libraries - package is not relocatable - package owns all directories it creates - directories it does not create owned by filesystem - no duplicates in %files - file permissions set properly - package contains proper %clean section - macro usage consistent - contains code - no large documentation - files in %doc do not affect runtime - no header files or static libraries - no pkgconfig files - no need for a devel subpackage - no .la files - GUI app contains proper .desktop file - package does not own files or directories owned by other packages APPROVED ==== SHOULD ==== - Add punctuation to %description. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review