Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579662 Daiki Ueno <dueno@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(dueno@xxxxxxxxxx) | --- Comment #4 from Daiki Ueno <dueno@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-10-28 05:40:39 EDT --- Thanks for taking this. It turned out that the current situation of Lookup development is a bit complicated. Actually there are 3 upstream versions: lookup 1.3: the original lookup, currently unmaintained lookup 2.0: beta version of lookup, maintained by the one of the lookup upstream developer lookup 1.4: lookup maintained by edict team, based on 1.3 Interestingly lookup 1.4 and lookup 2.0 are both trying to add new features, as well as bug fixes. >From my half year testing with 2.0, it is actually beta quality at the moment (IMO). So I decided to package 1.4. Debian also ships with 1.4. Here are updated spec and SRPM: Spec URL: http://ueno.fedorapeople.org/emacs-lookup/emacs-lookup.spec SRPM URL: http://ueno.fedorapeople.org/emacs-lookup/emacs-lookup-1.4.1-1.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review