Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635450 --- Comment #6 from LukÃÅ Zapletal <lzap@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-10-25 03:18:30 EDT --- Hello Rudolf, you are right. I have been investigating this on the weekend and I was wondering why yum tells me there is no "mono" package. :-) Fixed. http://static.zapletalovi.com/fedora/rpm/docky/2.0.7-2/ $ rpmlint docky-2.0.7-2.fc13.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint docky-2.0.7-2.fc13.i686.rpm docky.i686: E: no-binary docky.i686: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/docky/docky.py 0644L /usr/bin/env docky.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary docky 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings. I am still not sure about the second rpmlint error. The docky.py has #!env python in it and this should be ok... Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review