Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641018 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-10-21 13:41:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Some questions first: > > > > * About Requires related to lib/nanoc3/filters/ > > - Are Requires related to lib/nanoc3/filers always required > > for this rpm? > > According to lib/nanoc3/filters.rb, filter scripts under lib/nanoc3/ > > are loaded only when actually using such filters, and when not > > using such filters the listed rpms don't seem to be needed. > > Yes that true. But to guarantee basic functionality for user, - So yes, we want to make rpms installed which is needed for "basic" functionality on this gem, however are all scripts under lib/nanoc3/filters classified as "basic" functionality for this rpm? For example, even without the rpms for the dependency of filters installed at all, $ ruby -rubygems -e 'require "nanoc3" ; puts Nanoc3::VERSION' works. > it's necessary to > include that gems. Otherwise functionality that is related > with those gems will be not available. - Just by default. So people can install the needed rpms afterwards when people wants to use the functionality. > And if they are already packaged for Fedora, I can't see the reason for > omitting them as a dependencies. - For people not using all of the filter functionality, not using unneeded rpms if possible is preferable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review