Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645288 --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-10-21 05:18:37 EDT --- rpmlint: sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS: rpmlint ../RPMS/ppc/erlang-xmlrpc-1.13-1.fc12.ppc.rpm erlang-xmlrpc.ppc: E: no-binary erlang-xmlrpc.ppc: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib erlang-xmlrpc.ppc: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/erlang-xmlrpc-1.13/LICENSE 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS: The first two messages indicating that erlang module is installed into arch-specific directory (%{_libdir}) while it consists from arch-independent data. Unfortunately this is how Erlang/OTP is designed. The last warning exists because I believe that touching original project's licenses is a generally bad idea. Anyway it doesn't harm anything. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review