Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518892 --- Comment #10 from Michel Alexandre Salim <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-10-19 12:20:05 EDT --- Apologies for the delay! Start of the semester here, been busy preparing. Thanks for mentioning the optimization flags -- I just noticed that I need to pass them as VFLAGS, and need to pair each GCC option with its own -X. Done now. I've disabled debuginfo generation for now, and stripped the library file by hand, because it looks like even after passing -g, the sources are still not being packaged in -debuginfo. I'm looking at the script right now but my hunch is that /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh does not know how to handle Vala sources (yet). (ref: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Debuginfo#Useless_or_incomplete_debuginfo_packages_due_to_other_reasons ) http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/gnome/gedit-valencia.spec http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/gnome/gedit-valencia-0.3.0-2.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review