[Bug 644259] Review Request: virt-what - detect if we are running in a virtual machine

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=644259

--- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-10-19 06:11:34 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)

Thanks for the quick review!

> Few suggestions:
> 1) as per latest packaging guidelines, if new package is supposed to be built
> on F13 and above then buildroot tag, %clean section and removal of buildroot in
> %install can be dropped.
> 
> See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#BuildRoot_tag and
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#.25clean

Right.  I will drop these when I add it to Fedora, but keep them
for RHEL 5.

> 2) No need of prefix in make install

Indeed, not sure how that crept in ...

> 3) Good if you will add some comment above Requires: about why these explicit
> requires are needed for this package.

The shell script requires them, and I'm assuming that RPM
cannot detect that.  I will add a comment as suggested.

> 4) Looks BR: pod2man is not needed. See successful koji build without it
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2542583

OK so pod2man is part of the default buildroot.  I don't know
if it's a good idea to depend on that?  Seems like it could
change in future and break the package, so an explicit BR is
a good idea ...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]