Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225843 --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(àààà) <panemade@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-10-18 06:25:50 EDT --- 1) Removing versioned BR: => Yes you are correct. We first used to build dependencies for this package and then this package. If that is the case then why to un-necessarily write versioned BR:? I think repoquery is the best option to check which packages need to be bumped as part of any dependent package bump. 2) Removing explicit Requires: ==> Guidelines says https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Explicit_Requires If I have missed any explicit requires, please tell me and will add it back to suggested patch. For your reference here is modified scratch package build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2540235 And See Requires generated automatically from .pc files at Processing files: gnome-vfs2-devel-2.24.4-2.fc15.x86_64 Requires: /usr/bin/pkg-config libgnomevfs-2.so.0()(64bit) pkgconfig(gconf-2.0) pkgconfig(gmodule-no-export-2.0) pkgconfig(gobject-2.0) pkgconfig(gthread-2.0) Compared to older version Processing files: gnome-vfs2-devel-2.24.4-1.fc15.x86_64 Requires: /usr/bin/pkg-config libgnomevfs-2.so.0()(64bit) pkgconfig(gconf-2.0) pkgconfig(gmodule-no-export-2.0) pkgconfig(gobject-2.0) pkgconfig(gthread-2.0) Looks both are equal. When I looked into .pc files I have not found any reference to pull dbus and hal dependencies. Please correct me if I am wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review