Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-alsaaudio - Python Alsa Bindings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213798 mr.ecik@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |mr.ecik@xxxxxxxxx OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik@xxxxxxxxx 2006-11-25 13:41 EST ------- MUST items: * rpmlint output: W: python-alsaaudio invalid-license PSF - see LICENSE * package is named well * spec file name is good * package meets Packaging Guideline * package is licensed with a PSF open-source compatible license * License field in spec file matches actual license * license file is included in %doc * md5sums are matching (23163f572f8f3a0b295f48f90165e767) * package successfully compiles on x86_64 * BuildRequires listed well * no locales * no need to %post and %postun sections * not relocatable * no duplicates in %files * every %files section includes %defattr * proper %clean sectio * macros used well Nothings stands in the way to approve this package :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review