[Bug 625603] Review Request: libaacs - Open implementation of AACS specification

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625603

Chris Adams <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |linux@xxxxxxxxxxx

--- Comment #9 from Chris Adams <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-10-13 16:14:40 EDT ---
I'm curious if a reason was given for the rejection.  AFAIK this does NOT have
the same issues as decss; that was claimed as a trade secret, while AACS is a
published spec, using encryption that is already in Fedora (AES).  The library
doesn't include any keys, nor does it do anything like the decss library (brute
forces keys).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]