Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639594 --- Comment #13 from Ankur Sinha <sanjay.ankur@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-10-13 13:39:30 EDT --- Hello, * Wed Oct 13 2010 Ankur Sinha <ankursinha AT fedoraproject DOT org> - 0.4-3 - Corrected license to LGPLv2+ and BSD - corrected directory ownership Updated spec: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/scout/scout.spec Updated srpm: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/scout/scout-0.4-3.fc13.src.rpm Mock build info at: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/scout/ rpmlint output: [Ankur@070905042 SPECS]$ rpmlint scout.spec ../SRPMS/scout-0.4-3.fc13.src.rpm /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/*.rpm scout.spec:10: W: macro-in-comment %{name} scout.spec:10: W: macro-in-comment %{version} scout.src:10: W: macro-in-comment %{name} scout.src:10: W: macro-in-comment %{version} scout.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary scout scout.src:10: W: macro-in-comment %{name} scout.src:10: W: macro-in-comment %{version} 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings. About the source URL. The utility that Gabriel suggested gives me a URL for the package which is only a redirect: http://githubredir.debian.net/github/lelutin/scout/v0.4.tar.gz [http://githubredir.debian.net/githubredir.cgi?author=lelutin&project=scout] However, the downloaded package name still contains the hash etc.(This link redirects to the normal download location). Since the Source0 needs the actual name of the tar to be extracted(which is not 0.4.tar.gz), this utility is not helpful here. Thank you for the review. regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review