Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eterm - a color vt102 terminal emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182173 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-11-24 15:23 EST ------- > 1) literally hundreds of "pointer targets ... differ in signedness" > warnings which are worrisome but perhaps ignorable I have used Eterm for years without problems... > 2) there appear to be some missing BuildRequires and/or some missing > functionality such as: > > checking for Etwin support... > checking for Tw_Open in -lTw... no > configure: WARNING: *** Twin support has been > disabled because libTw was not found *** I believe this is support for a Twin - a textmode window environment, (http://twin.sf.net), this issue cannot be a blocker. Warning is gone with --disable-etwin. > and I think libXmu-devel needs to be a BR since I don't see how it > gets pulled in by any of the other BRs. Please take a look. Yeah, added pcre-devel too. And fixed the desktop file. > It'll be easy enough to sort out the BuildRequires with mock as soon > as libast is in Extras so we can leave that for later. libast is in FE now :-) New files: SPEC: http://web.phys.ntnu.no/~terjeros/eterm/eterm.spec SRPMS: http://web.phys.ntnu.no/~terjeros/eterm/eterm-0.9.4-2.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review