Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631972 --- Comment #13 from Julien Anguenot <julien@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-10-12 08:43:49 EDT --- Hey Robin, (In reply to comment #11) > I would prefer to talk about Plone 4 at first. We can talk about Plone4 first. Please note that this is very critical for us to be able to move forward with Plone3 at the same time though. > I agree that it would be hard to maintain if we make a RPM for each application > level eggs. But if we build an all-in-one RPM for Plone, and a user want to > deploy a Zope configuration without Plone, then, shall we build another > all-in-one RPM for Zope or tell him to install the all-in-one Plone instead? You are right, we do not want to force a user to install a all-in-one Plone bundle and we believe having a ZTK, Zope, ZODB and Plone RPMs is reasonable. > So, all-in-one bundles may be not acceptable. At this time, I may suggest to > separate that all-in-one RPM for Plone into several parts: > > - ZTK > Packages in the ZTK collection is packaged RPMs per egg. > > - ZODB > We have a RPM for the egg of ZODB3. > > - Zope > A bundled RPM contains the eggs of Zope2 and all its dependencies other than > ZTK, ZODB and existing packages(like Paste). > > - Plone > A bundled RPM contains, you know, others. We would be fine with this approach on our side for Plone4. For Plone3.3.5, the ZTK is out of the picture but the principle remains the same. We can move forward and generate these RPMs and update the Plone3 RPMs to depends on these new ones as well as package Plone4. Let me know if you believe we should move forward with this on our side? As I said, we are committed to maintain these on the long term as this is critical for some of our customers. Would you would like to continue this discussion on this ticket or on the actual python-devel mailing list? Let me know please. Thank you. J. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review