[Bug 626462] Review Request: libmstun - A C++ library providing STUN client utilities

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626462

Kalev Lember <kalev@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+

--- Comment #3 from Kalev Lember <kalev@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-10-11 08:28:25 EDT ---
Fedora review libmstun-0.8.0-0.1.20091007svn3734.fc12.src.rpm 2010-10-11

+ OK
! needs attention

rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint libmstun \
          libmstun-devel \
          libmstun-0.8.0-0.1.20091007svn3734.fc15.src.rpm \
          libmstun-debuginfo-0.8.0-0.1.20091007svn3734.fc15.i686.rpm
libmstun.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US minisip -> mini sip,
mini-sip, minister
libmstun.i686: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libmstun.so.0.0.0
/lib/libm.so.6
libmstun.i686: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libmstun.so.0.0.0
exit@xxxxxxxxx
libmstun-devel.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) libmnstun -> libertinism,
libidinous, libertine
libmstun-devel.i686: W: no-documentation
libmstun.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US minisip -> mini sip,
mini-sip, minister
libmstun.src: W: invalid-url Source0: libmstun-0.8.0.tar.bz2
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings.

+ Rpmlint warnings are mostly harmless and can be ignored.
  shared-lib-calls-exit is something to talk about with upstream as it might
  result in application crashes if a library unexpectedly calls exit().
+ The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
+ Spec file name matches the base package name
+ The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
Licensing Guidelines.
+ The license field in the spec file matches the actual license
+ The package contains license file (COPYING.LIB)
+ Spec file is written in American English
+ Spec file is legible
+ Following instructions in the spec file to check out sources
  from upstream svn repo produce matching tarball.
  8bcc8a0dddc84d3a7e87484c3dda5974  libmstun-0.8.0.tar.bz2

+ The package builds in koji
n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed
+ BuildRequires look sane
n/a The spec file MUST handle locales properly
+ ldconfig is properly called in %post and %postun
+ Package does not bundle copies of system libraries
n/a Package isn't relocatable
+ Package owns all directories it creates
+ No duplicate files in %files
+ Permissions are properly set and %files has %defattr
+ Consistent use of macros
+ The package must contain code, or permissable content.
n/a Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage
+ Files marked %doc don't affect the package
+ Header files are in -devel
n/a Static libraries should be in -static
+ Library files that end in .so are in -devel package
+ -devel requires the fully versioned base
+ Package doesn't contain any libtool .la files
n/a Packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file
+ Directory ownership sane
+ Filenames are valid UTF-8

Looks good.

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]