Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216916 Jochen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |Jochen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From Jochen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-11-22 13:50 EST ------- God: + Source package was not complainted by rpmlint. * Local build works fine. * Rpmlint is quited on binary packages. * Local install/uninstall workds ok. * Tarball matches with upstream. * Mock build works fine. Bad: - Devel package should contains some documentation for developers. I thins, that the stuff on /usr/doc/arpack-2.1/EXAMPLES shold be in the developement package. - Rpmlint complaints on installed package: rpmlint arpack W: arpack undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libarpack.so.2.1 etime_ W: arpack undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libarpack.so.2.1 slamch_ W: arpack undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libarpack.so.2.1 cgemv_ W: arpack undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libarpack.so.2.1 cscal_ --- A lot of simular lines --- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review