[Bug 637489] Review Request: perl-KinoSearch1 - Search engine library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637489

--- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell <iarnell@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-10-04 11:37:39 EDT ---
It looks like Ian Burrell had similar concerns about the license for KinoSearch
(from which KinoSearch1 has been forked). The perl KinoSearch distribution is
all original code under "the same terms as perl itself", but is loosely based
on Lucene (which is ASL 2.0). I'll copy the relevant clarification from
perl-KinoSearch spec.

As for vendor/core, I think that could use some discussion on the mailing list.
I know it's just a matter of labelling at the minute, but if we do need to
split core and vendor again for some reason, it will be a lot easier if we
still have the vendor macros in the specs.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]