Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632051 --- Comment #4 from Jaroslav Reznik <jreznik@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-10-04 08:55:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Patches: do we really need all patches? at least missing-Epoch-function is not > > needed anymore as we have Qt 4.7, please update > > I removed patch5 from spec. All other patches are remained, they are all > extracted from upstream SRPM, I think it'll be easier to track upstream RPM and > bugzilla system closely. Agreed. > Currently, I track F14 with Meego 1.1 which will be released on 2010-10-27. It's getting closer! > > Build: not ok > > > > + ./configure -prefix /usr -libdir /usr/lib64 -release > > > > QTDIR variable was set but could not find /usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin/qmake\n > > If your Qt is in a nonstandard location, try: > > QTDIR=<path to your Qt directory> ./configure > > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.bm6HwK (%build) > > > It's weird, I can build the package in rawhide koji. Maybe this issue is > trigger once the system has both qt3-devel and qt-devel installed. I'll check it - it should call qmake-qt4. > > > > PS; could you add me as co-maintainer to MeeGo packages once reviewed? I'm Qt > > co-maintainer and Fedora Mobility guy from Qt/Plasma Netbook side of evil. > > Thanks. > > OK, please also apply co-maintainer for exsited meego packages in pkgdb(e.g. > libaccounts-glib libaccounts-qt contextkit libqttracker). Great, applied. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review