Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631763 --- Comment #9 from Richard Hughes <rhughes@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-10-01 11:26:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Right, rpm considers the Group tag optional since version 4.6. Though I could > swear Fedora Packaging Guidelines still asked for the tag to be specified, I > cannot find the requirement anywhere now. Perhaps it's been removed already. I think so. > But please be consistent. The -devel subpackage does have a Group tag. Agreed, apologies. > I suggest you extend the %description for the main package a bit. Right now it > only repeats what the Summary says and it is not very informative. Gotcha. I've added something better. New spec and SRPMS for review: http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/temp/zif.spec http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/temp/zif-0.1.0-3.fc14.src.rpm Richard. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review