[Bug 638418] Review Request: ehcache (for cloud package in bug #630179)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638418

Alexander Kurtakov <akurtako@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |akurtako@xxxxxxxxxx

--- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov <akurtako@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-09-29 04:20:31 EDT ---
I can review this one and sponsor you but I have few comments:
1. If we don't have a clear way where are the sources coming from or how to
generate the tarball it's a nogo.
2. Choose only one of the build systems either ant or maven.
3. Always provide a unversioned javadoc and remove these post/postun sections
for javadoc.
4. Drop gcj-support - we don't need it nowadays.
5. Ehcache has seen big restructuring -
http://svn.terracotta.org/svn/ehcache/tags/ and
http://ehcache.org/roadmap.html# and
http://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/sourceforge-releases/net/sf/ehcache/ehcache/
6. Update to latest version - 2.2.0
7. Fix file attributes to the defaults for fedora.

And this is only from the first sight :).
Also if you drop gcj you won't need gnu-crypto.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]