[Bug 629247] Rename Request: meego-panel-myzone - MeeGo Panel for display of current social information

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629247

--- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-09-26 11:42:11 EDT ---
FTBFS on F-14 - is this package designed only for F-15?

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2490065

Koji build for F-15:

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2490068

REVIEW:

Legend: + = PASSED, - = FAILED, 0 = Not Applicable

+ rpmlint not silent but its messages can be safely ignored in this case:

Sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS: rpmlint ~/Desktop/meego-panel-myzone-*
meego-panel-myzone.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US chekck ->
check, Chekhov, Cheka
meego-panel-myzone.x86_64: W: self-obsoletion moblin-panel-myzone < 0.2.6
obsoletes moblin-panel-myzone = 0.2.5-1.fc15
meego-panel-myzone.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc
/etc/xdg/autostart/meego-panel-myzone.desktop
meego-panel-myzone.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc
/etc/gconf/schemas/meego-panel-myzone.schemas
meego-panel-myzone-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.
Sulaco ~/rpmbuild/SPECS:

+ The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines .
+ The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
+ The package meets the Packaging Guidelines .
+ The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
Licensing Guidelines .

- The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license!
Proper license tag is LGPLv2+

+ The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included
in %doc.
+ The spec file is written in American English.
+ The spec file for the package is legible.

+/- The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one primary architecture but only in Rawhide.

+ All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires.
+ The spec file handles locales properly.
+ The package calls ldconfig in %post and %postun.
+ The package does NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
0 The package is not designed to be relocatable.
 The package owns all directories that it creates.
+ The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files
listings.
+ Permissions on files are set properly.
+ The package consistently uses macros.
+ The package contains code, or permissible content.
0 No extremely large documentation files
+ Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the
application.
+ Header files are packaged in a -devel package.
0 No static libraries
+ The library file that end in .so (without suffix) packaged in a -devel
package.
+ The devel package requires the base package using a fully versioned
dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
+ The package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives.

+/- The package includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file should properly
installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section but instead it is
placed into 

%{_sysconfdir}/xdg/autostart/meego-panel-myzone.desktop
%{_datadir}/mutter-meego/panels/meego-panel-myzone.desktop

I don't know too much about Meego - is it intentional? Also there is one more
*.desktop file:

/usr/share/applications/myzone.desktop

This one should be validated in the %install section using
desktop-file-validate (
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop )

+ Packages does not own files or directories already owned by other packages.
+ All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8.

So, please:

* Fix license tag
* Explain whether this package is designed only for Rawhide or not
* Add validation for desktop file(s) (at least for one, stored in
/usr/share/applications )

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]