Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634700 --- Comment #12 from Dave Malcolm <dmalcolm@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-09-21 19:16:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) (snip) > Still don't know what to do about the debuginfo and stripping issue. nirik on > fedora-devel suggests CFLAGS=%optflags, trying now. (In reply to comment #11) > Uploaded a new SRPM (didn't bump the release, sorry). Added a patch to add (Looks like you also uploaded a new .spec file into place) > --libdir which fixes the hardcoded-library-path issue, removed the executable > bit from example files to get rid of the spurious-executable-perm error. Still > don't know what to do about the debuginfo and stripping issue. nirik on > fedora-devel suggests CFLAGS=%optflags, trying now. Did that fix it? (please can you try scratch builds and add the URLs to this bug). If not, this kind of thing can be due to a permissions error on the generated library; iirc if they're not executable, then the post-processing stripping hook in rpm-build doesn't pick up on them. Are they getting built with "-g"? (to actually generate debugging info within GCC) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review