Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631190 Martin Gieseking <martin.gieseking@xxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Martin Gieseking <martin.gieseking@xxxxxx> 2010-09-21 13:27:23 EDT --- Hi Damian, Here is the formal review of libnxt. I couldn't find any further issues, so the package is ready now. The next step is to request a git repository for this package. For further details see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVS_admin_requests $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-13-x86_64/result/*.rpm libnxt.src: W: invalid-url Source0: http://libnxt.googlecode.com/files/libnxt-0.3.tar.gz HTTP Error 404: Not Found libnxt.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary nxt-fwexec libnxt.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary nxt-fwflash 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. All warnings can be ignored: - invalid URL warning is false positive - no manpages available for the utilities --------------------------------- key: [+] OK [.] OK, not applicable [X] needs work --------------------------------- [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license. - GPLv2+ according to source file headers [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+] MUST: The file containing the text of the license(s) must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source. $ md5sum libnxt-0.3.tar.gz* 05be5f5b8822f10e4fc4e1dea7d5e770 libnxt-0.3.tar.gz 05be5f5b8822f10e4fc4e1dea7d5e770 libnxt-0.3.tar.gz.1 [+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. - Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2479716 [.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work ... [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires. [.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. [.] MUST: Packages storing shared library files (not just symlinks) must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [+] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. [.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, ... [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in %files. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. [+] MUST: Files in %doc must not affect the runtime of the application. [.] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [.] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [.] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix ... [.] MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency [+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. [.] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot}. [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [.] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file ... [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [.] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. [.] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package. [.] SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) should be placed in a -devel pkg. [.] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, ... ---------------- Package APPROVED ---------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review