Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595697 --- Comment #9 from Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-09-17 16:40:59 EDT --- Spec file https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-regex-tdfa.spec?attredirects=0&d=1 Source rpm https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-regex-tdfa-1.1.4-1.fc13.src.rpm?attredirects=0&d=1 There has been a version update from 1.1.3 to 1.1.4 Rpmlint output ghc-regex-tdfa.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-regex-tdfa.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libtre -> libre, Liberec, librate The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-regex-tdfa.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-regex-tdfa.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libtre -> libre, Liberec, librate The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-regex-tdfa.x86_64: W: executable-stack /usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.1/regex-tdfa-1.1.4/libHSregex-tdfa-1.1.4-ghc6.12.1.so The binary declares the stack as executable. Executable stack is usually an error as it is only needed if the code contains GCC trampolines or similar constructs which uses code on the stack. One common source for needlessly executable stack cases are object files built from assembler files which don't define a proper .note.GNU-stack section. ghc-regex-tdfa-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-regex-tdfa-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libtre -> libre, Liberec, librate The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-regex-tdfa-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-regex-tdfa-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-regex-tdfa-prof.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libtre -> libre, Liberec, librate The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-regex-tdfa-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-regex-tdfa-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.1/regex-tdfa-1.1.4/libHSregex-tdfa-1.1.4_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 10 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review