Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634515 --- Comment #6 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-09-16 23:42:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #2) > > * Locales: language files aren't being marked as belonging to a specific > > language > Those files provides locale instances rather than translations. From the point > of view of function, they parallel the files /usr/share/i18n/locales/*, which > are provided by glibc-common. Do we use the %lang directive only if the file is > in a natural language? > That's a good question. I thought we marked that type of file but checking glibc-common, those files are not marked. I'll discuss with spot whether that's a bug in glibc-common or if we don't want to mark this type of file. Note: Command to check what's marked on any given package: rpm -q --qf '[%{filelangs} %{filenames}\n]' glibc-common > > * Locales: under /usr/lib rather than %{_datadir} -- FHS wants architecture > > independent data file in %{_datadir} > Will fix, but the directory where to place those files should be considered > carefully, or I will consult upstream. Sounds good. I don't know the best directory, just that they go under %{_datadir} somewhere. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review