Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630778 --- Comment #3 from Michel Alexandre Salim <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-09-15 16:52:27 EDT --- Koji F-14 build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2469802 Needs fixing: - -doc files should be in versioned directory. Instead of copying them manually you should probably just use relative paths when declaring them e.g. %doc test/*.py - -doc files should not be executable (see full review below) Suggestion for improvement: - add a %check section with the following: cd test PYTHONPATH=../build/lib.linux-*/ python testall.py * TODO Review [80%] ** DONE Names [2/2] *** DONE Package name *** DONE Spec name ** DONE Meets [[http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines][guidelines]] ** DONE source files match upstream $ md5sum llvm-py-0.6.tar.bz2 ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES/llvm-py-0.6.tar.bz2 eec62e4ce6f95f6e01edcba59747933d llvm-py-0.6.tar.bz2 eec62e4ce6f95f6e01edcba59747933d /home/michel/rpmbuild/SOURCES/llvm-py-0.6.tar.bz2 ** DONE License [3/3] *** DONE License is Fedora-approved *** DONE License field accurate *** DONE License included iff packaged by upstream ** TODO rpmlint [1/2] *** DONE on src.rpm llvm-py.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US backend -> backed, backbend, back end ==> ignore this llvm-py.src: W: invalid-url Source0: http://llvm-py.googlecode.com/files/llvm-py-0.6.tar.bz2 HTTP Error 404: Not Found ==> ignore -- spectool works fine, not sure what's wrong with rpmlint here 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. *** FAIL on x86_64.rpm llvm-py.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US backend -> backed, backbend, back end ==> ignore this llvm-py.x86_64: W: private-shared-object-provides /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/llvm/_core.so _core.so()(64bit) ==> ignore this llvm-py-doc.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/llvm-py/uses.py ... llvm-py-doc.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/llvm-py/operands.py ==> see below llvm-py-doc.x86_64: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/llvm-py/uses.py /usr/bin/env ... llvm-py-doc.x86_64: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/llvm-py/operands.py /usr/bin/env ==> can be ignored, they are example scripts after all 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 32 warnings. ** DONE Language & locale [3/3] *** DONE Spec in US English *** DONE Spec legible *** N/A Use %find_lang to handle locale files ** FAIL Build [2/3] *** DONE Koji results http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2469802 *** DONE BRs complete *** FAIL Directory ownership /usr/share/doc/llvm-py not owned by any package ** TODO Spec inspection [6/8] *** FAIL ldconfig for libraries - State "FAIL" from "TODO" [2010-09-15 Wed 21:29] \\ ldconfig is called on %post and %postun even though there are no libraries *** DONE No duplicate files *** FAIL File permissions - State "FAIL" from "TODO" [2010-09-15 Wed 22:22] \\ -doc: files in %{_docdir} should not have executable permission *** DONE Filenames must be UTF-8 *** DONE Has %clean section (except F-13+: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25clean) Note: BuildRoot declaration can be removed on F-10+ and EL-6+ *** DONE %buildroot cleaned on %install *** DONE Macro usage consistent *** DONE Documentation [2/2] **** DONE If large docs, separate -doc note: should mark this as BuildArch: noarch **** DONE %doc files are non-essential ** N/A Desktop file validation ** DONE [[http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets][Scriptlets]] [4/4] *** N/A desktop-database (desktop entry has MimeType) *** N/A icon cache (icons in %{_datadir}/icons/) *** N/A info files *** N/A mimeinfo (file in %{_datadir}/mime/packages) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review