Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576757 --- Comment #4 from Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-09-12 15:16:58 EDT --- Hi, Sorry for the long delay. I recently switched teams with in Red Hat and as such have been overwhelmed with work a bit. Here is a full review of this package: Full review: Good: - rpmlint checks return: moovida-plugins-good.noarch: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. These can all be ignored - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPLv3) OK, text not %doc, but also not in upstream tarbal, so no problem, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime Approved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review