Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631972 --- Comment #3 from Nikolay Kim <nikolay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-09-09 11:33:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > * The package 'plone', though retired, has already been in Fedora. You should > request for surviving that package instead of submitting the same package with > a different name. > > Refer to: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/plone i think Plone 3 should have separate rpm because in many cases exact version of plone is required. for most of our customers we are still using plone 3. also i don't think split zope and plone is a good idea, each plone version require exact zope version and python packages. > * You should submit the latest version of that package for review. The latest > version of Plone is 4.0. > > Refer to: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/Plone/ we are willing to make plone4 rpm as well. > * If you are sponsored, you may help updating Plone for epel5, which needs > Plone 3. > > Refer to: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497933 > i can rename plone3 rpm to plone. but in any case plone 4 should have different rpm name. (In reply to comment #2) > Packging plone is not an easy task, we still wait for the final release of zope > 2.13 which is compatible with python 2.7. i don't think using zope rpm for plone is good idea. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review