[Bug 215165] Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: audacious-plugins - Plugins for the Audacious media player


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215165


rpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx




------- Additional Comments From rpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2006-11-16 21:41 EST -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> So, in conclusion, I think that this specific rpmlint warning can be ignored.
> I'd be happy about a third opinion, though.

I think it can be ignored, too.

I have another comment, however. I know it's a matter of preference, but why not
put each BuildRequired package in its own line and sort the list alphabetically?
It makes it easier to spot missing builddeps, for example: fluidsynth-devel and
libglade2-devel. The package doesn't build here without the latter.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]