Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617141 Benjamin Otte <otte@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |otte@xxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #25 from Benjamin Otte <otte@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-08-31 18:43:30 EDT --- About the bundling worries: As far as I can see this is the typical way new libraries are developed in GNOME and GStreamer-land. For anyone involved with GNOME, consider this similar to libegg. The process goes something like this: First, ship the files as in-package copy in the programs that need it. This allows rapid changes to API, code etc. During this time, the library is not released as a separate product, it's explicitly targeted for copy/paste. When the API is agreed on and deemed stable, import it into GStreamer's support library collection: gstreamer-plugins-base, which then guarantees API stability. So the only technical problem is to not get conflicts when header or library files from different projects shipping the code or from when the library finally does get released. And from a quick look at the package, they have put the files into the gupnp-dlna namespace, so everything is fine. Last but not least, all of this work is happening inside the GStreamer community, so I don't think the typical worries about bundling apply here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review