Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aquamarine - Themeable window decorator and compositing manager for Beryl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215563 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik@xxxxxxxxx 2006-11-16 14:51 EST ------- MUST items: * rpmlint output: W: aquamarine no-documentation (no documentation provided by upstream) * package is named well * spec file name is good * package meets Packaging Guidelines ?* package is licensed with an GPL open-source compatible license ?* License field in spec file matches actual license * license file isn't included in %doc * no upstream release, unable to check md5 * package successfully compiles on x86_64 * BuildRequires listed well (mock builds successfully) * no locales * no need to %post and %postun sections * not relocatable * no duplicates in %files * every %files section includes %defattr * proper %clean section * macros used well License is not included in a package, I couldn't find any reliable site to check its license. Thus, if you show me a place where the license's written, I'll be happy to approve this package :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review