Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595011 --- Comment #18 from Rafael Aquini <aquini@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-08-26 21:53:34 EDT --- David, It has been less than 10 days, and I've got two replies from sshdfilter's upstream developer. That's great for your work here, as you won't need to cope with forking this software and take all this burden, just to fit it into Fedora guidelines. Even better than that, you will be fitting it into guidelines and yet you will have support from its upstream, which seems to be very cooperative and interested on keep sshdfilter improving without making it specific. Said that, please consider the following approach in order to release a new version of sshdfilter's SRPM: [1] Download & ship sshdfilter upstream's tarball within your SRPM -- Always; [2] Whatever you may need to modify in the original source, do it through PATCHES. Patches can be applied to original tarball at SPEC %setup session. Remember to comment your patches in SPEC. [3] Share your work with community, submitting those patches to upstream. Greg will be glad in having them and publishing them at sshdfilter project website. Looking forward your reply, Best regards. P.S.: Feel free to contact me whenever you need, I'll be avaiable to help you if you want. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review