[Bug 598511] Review Request: libgtextutils - Assaf Gordon text utilities

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598511

--- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola@xxxxxx> 2010-08-24 12:24:01 EDT ---
rpmlint output:
libgtextutils.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Assaf -> Assad, Assam,
Assai
libgtextutils.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fastx -> fast,
fasts, fast x
libgtextutils.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Assaf -> Assad, Assam,
Assai
libgtextutils.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fastx -> fast,
fasts, fast x
libgtextutils-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.

These are OK.

**

I recommend using just
 http://hannonlab.cshl.edu/fastx_toolkit/
as the URL.

**

MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a
duplicate. OK

MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used
consistently. NEEDSWORK
- You are mixing %{optflags} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. This is not allowed.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Using_.25.7Bbuildroot.7D_and_.25.7Boptflags.7D_vs_.24RPM_BUILD_ROOT_and_.24RPM_OPT_FLAGS

- The %files section could use some clarity. Using wildcards where they are not
needed is bad style, and packages might end up owning stuff they're not
supposed to. Please change
 %{_includedir}/*
to 
 %{_includedir}/gtextutils/
and consider also using
 %{_libdir}/libgtextutils-*.so.*
 %{_libdir}/libgtextutils-*.so


MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK
MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK
MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the 
Licensing Guidelines. OK

MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
NEEDSWORK
- licensecheck reports:
 ./src/gtextutils/string_tokenize.h: AGPL (v3 or later) 
and the same for other files as well. Looking at the license text itself
confirms that this is a "v3 or later" license. => License tag should be
AGPLv3+.

MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL. OK
d6969aa0d31cc934e1fedf3fe3d0dc63  libgtextutils-0.6.tar.bz2
d6969aa0d31cc934e1fedf3fe3d0dc63  ../SOURCES/libgtextutils-0.6.tar.bz2

MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK
MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A

MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. NEEDSWORK
- The compilation process adds some of its own flags:
" -Wextra -Wformat-nonliteral -Wformat-security -Wswitch-default -Wswitch-enum
-Wunused-parameter -Wfloat-equal -Werror -DDEBUG -g -O1 -DDEBUG -g -O1
-version-info 0:0:0 -release 0.6"
- You must get rid of at least the "-g -O1". You'll need to patch configure to
do this. I suggest removing lines 15093-15100 altogether, which read

if test "$debug" = "true"
then
  CFLAGS="${CFLAGS} -DDEBUG -g -O1"
  CXXFLAGS="${CFLAGS} -DDEBUG -g -O1"
else
  CFLAGS="${CFLAGS} -O3"
  CXXFLAGS="${CFLAGS} -O3"
fi


MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK
MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package
that owns the directory. OK
MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK
MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK
MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK
MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK
MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect
runtime of application. OK
MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK
MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A
MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files
ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK
MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency. OK
MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK
MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A
MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK
SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK
SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from
upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK
SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK
EPEL: Clean section exists. OK
EPEL: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK
EPEL: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]