Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602574 Martin Gieseking <martin.gieseking@xxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |martin.gieseking@xxxxxx Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #9 from Martin Gieseking <martin.gieseking@xxxxxx> 2010-08-24 08:11:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > I've disabled ppc and ppc64 architectures in the spec file. Do we need a > separate bug to file this problem? I've put a comment in the spec file pointing > to here. OK, fine. You don't need to file the ppc issue separately. If possible, it should be fixed upstream in a future version. Maybe you can work together with the developer to find the problem, e.g. by using the ppc test machine [1]. I'm going to do the formal review later today. [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Machine_Resources_For_Package_Maintainers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review