Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617141 --- Comment #13 from Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-08-23 17:55:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #10) > > Peter, you're right regarding pkgconfig-files and the dependency. > > Cool. Will leave as is. > > > As far as I can see, the COPYING files calls itself > > GNU LIBRARY GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE Version 2, June 1991 > > (taken from here: > > http://gitorious.org/gupnp/gupnp-vala/blobs/master/COPYING > > > > Looking at e.g. ../BUILD/gupnp-dlna-0.2.1/libgupnp-dlna/gupnp-dlna-discoverer.c > > I can not find the word LESSER license, but GPL v2 or any later version. > > Speaking with upstream the licensing in wrong and there will be a new upstream > release shortly to fix the problem. How are they going to fix this? Will they change from Library to Lesser to plain GPL? > > > There seems to be a third issue: The tarball includes a copy of gst-convenience > > > and seems to use it for building. But this is a separate project: > > > http://git.collabora.co.uk/?p=user/edward/gst-convenience.git;a=tree > > > > > > Therefore it violates the "no bundled libaries" guideline: > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries > > > > Till is right, I missed that. Can you separate it? > > Its not meant to be separated, speaking with upstream its a staging library > that will be moved to upstream gst stuff. Its covered in this bug > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=625944 and it will be dropped and > the gst dependencies updated once its there. This is probably ok then. Have you considered mentioning this in the spec or opening a bug about it once the package is imported to make sure this is not forgotten e.g. in case it is merged in gstreamer but still shipped with gupnp-dlna? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review