[Bug 617141] Review Request: gupnp-dlna - A collection of helpers for building DLNA applications

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617141

Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |opensource@xxxxxxxxx

--- Comment #9 from Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-08-23 15:52:56 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #7)

> === Issues ===
> 1. IMHO License field should be GPLv2+ and not LGPL...

What makes you think so? From my quick observation it seems that LGPLv2+ seems
to be correct. Did you spot something that says it is GPLv2+?

There seems to be a third issue: The tarball includes a copy of gst-convenience
and seems to use it for building. But this is a separate project:
http://git.collabora.co.uk/?p=user/edward/gst-convenience.git;a=tree

Therefore it violates the "no bundled libaries" guideline:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]