Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625476 --- Comment #4 from Rob Crittenden <rcritten@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-08-19 16:05:27 EDT --- * source files match upstream: c54f32773a8c78c08340be330882fdb990cfb107 libpath_utils-0.2.1.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named and is cleanly written * specfile uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. (both of them) * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (F-13, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * %check is present * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * documentation present in -devel package * %docs are set correctly APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review