[Bug 487241] Review Request: ntlmaps - NTLM Authentication Proxy Service

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487241

--- Comment #5 from Chris Smart <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-08-18 18:41:18 EDT ---
Thanks for posting that link, Matt. You are right, NTLMAPS can be quite
unreliable and a resource hog - but it was better than nothing!

I have tested cntlm too and so far it seems to work *much* more reliably. They
provide a 32bit RPM which worked just fine on my 64bit Fedora 13 install.

I agree with Matt, and vote for cntlm over ntlmaps.

However, I wonder whether there might be patent / licensing issues for Red Hat
to include this - which is why it never has been before?

-c

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]