Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209260 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-11-14 17:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > Package looks almost well. > I haven't checked the another beryl packages yet, but you > use Provides: beryl in beryl-core package and here you're using > Requires: beryl-core. Maybe Requires: beryl would be better? I'm thinking stick with beryl-core in the sub-packages, for the reason below... > And the another thing: if a normal user type `yum install beryl`, > he won't get working beryl environment. He'll get only a beryl-core > package which alone is useless. Maybe you should create dependencies > differently to make possibility to install all essential beryl packages > by simply typying `yum install beryl`? How do you think? I initially did Provides: beryl in beryl-core because it seemed right at the time. It did cross my mind the other day to perhaps switch to a beryl meta-package that Requires: all the beryl components. Only downside with that is that it can suck in a fair amount of stuff now that people may not want if they're running one desktop or another (i.e. kde vs. gnome, where aquamarine Requires: some kde stuff, heliodor Requires: some gnome stuff). Could do three meta-packages, beryl, which in turn Requires: beryl-kde and beryl-gnome, which in turn Requires: packages appropriately for each DE. Some scheme along these lines definitely seems better than beryl-core Provides: beryl, which does indeed provide nothing of use in the case of a user yum installing only beryl. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review