Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477949 --- Comment #13 from Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-08-17 08:23:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > Actually, i do not have enough time for all the things (prove/gain my > competence as Fedora package submitter) in nearest 2 weeks, so i do not know > ..., but... if the rpm is ok (it can be found at hlterm.sourceforge.net) i (or > someone else) can submit it to Fedora repo. There's no time limit for you to gain sponsorship and hence be able to include your package in Fedora. Of course, someone else might step in and submit it and go through the process in the meantime though. Just do what you can, when you can. > About other packages: recently i found that someone pushed CERN's ROOT package > into the repo. It inspired me a bit to make rpms of clhep and geant4 (i use > ROOT and geant4 for my work and have installed them from sources on my > computers). If geant4's license allows package distribution in Fedora repo, i > will prefer to use rpms for all those things to make installation simple. So i > can try to make them and open a new request. If a package's license is listed as a good license here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#Good_Licenses then there should be no problem submitting it as a package. If it's a new license that's not been approved for Fedora yet and not obviously non-free (if it was, that would be a blocker for Fedora) then it would have to go through fedora-legal for approval. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review