Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623425 Chen Lei <supercyper1@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger@xxxxxxxxx --- Comment #17 from Chen Lei <supercyper1@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-08-16 22:40:54 EDT --- Actually, I don't think Group is something we are worth discussing which is almost useless. The fact is both Development/Languages and Development/Libraries are used in the repo for python modules, see rpm -qg 'groupname' . For package name, I think we should be more careful, currently python module pkgnames in fedora are just a mess, it's not easy to find requires for a python modules with many dependencies. Keep consistency with other distribution makes sense, however we should not use the same name with them in some circumstance, because debian/ubuntu/arch/gentoo don't allow [A-Z] in pkgname at all. IMHO, since the upstream name and the namespace(module name) for this package are both PySide, so python-PySide is the most suitable name to match FPG. Actually, we should keep consistency with fedora existed packages over other distributions', now we already have python3-PyQt4 in repo. FYI, some distribution(e.g. mandriva) also use pyside as the pkgname. >From fedora naming guideline: Packages of python modules (thus they rely on python as a parent) use a slightly different naming scheme. They should take into account the upstream name of the python module. This makes a package name format of python-$NAME. When in doubt, use the name of the module that you type to import it in a script. I am adding Toshio to CC for second opinion since the naming for python modules is a bit complicated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review