Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595011 --- Comment #12 from Rafael Aquini <aquini@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-08-15 14:49:34 EDT --- David, Please consider the following: [2] I did not mean you should do a 'chkconfig sshdfilter on', what I was trying to point out is that every SysV Inintscript must have a "chkconfig:" line in its header. That header line, which is missing in sshdfilter, tells chkconfig what runlevels are apropriated to running the script, and in what order the script will be started or killed on those runlevels. [1] & [3] Dealing with unresponsive upstream is a real issue for packagers. If sshdfilter's upstream has left the project behind, and you are really willing to get this software into Fedora, so I encourage you to fork it in another project. However, you can not modify the source package shipped by upstream before shipping it within you SRPM and consider it as a fork. The source inside a SRPM must always match its upstream's download. I don't think you should give up sshdfilter. It may sound cliché, but with no pain, no gain! Keep working on it because your goal, right now, should be getting this work reviewed and you sponsored to the packagers group. I don't have the power to sponsor you, but I can help reviewing your work and pointing the right way to you get it into Fedora. Also, you can count on me to help with any other matter regarded to this package. Feel free to contact me whenever you want. Regards. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review