Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623945 --- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola@xxxxxx> 2010-08-14 19:25:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Shakthi, > update the URL as Jussi recommended, but keep your summary as is, since > with a package name "nesc", "The nesC compiler" does not convey much as > information to the user. Well, the odd thing here is that the tarball name is nesc instead of nescc, which it should be logically (nesC compiler). I don't think "Compiler used by TinyOS" is a better summary than "The nesC compiler", since the former doesn't really hold any exact information about the package. In general a project may have many requirements, so in general summaries like "library used by foo" are frowned upon. Just my 2c. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review